![]() “Current weapons that fall under the definition remain legal. Heidi Rathjen, co-ordinator of gun-control group PolySeSouvient, said Tuesday the planned definition “just adds more confusion to the classification system because it only applies to future models, meaning there is a contradiction from the outset.” “It’s possible that police would charge you and let the courts sort it out - in essence using the process as the punishment.” Adding a date component only further muddies the waters for law enforcement,” the association said. “Police forces are already challenged to know what category a firearm falls into under the current classification system. “What happens if you are pulled over while in possession of a centrefire firearm purchased prior to this definition coming into force?” the Canadian Shooting Sports Association asked in a note to members about the proposal. “You could drive a dump truck through that wording.”īeyond the halls of Parliament, voices on either side of the federal push to legislate additional controls on firearms agreed that the latest approach would not bring greater certainty and clarity to the system. Members of the House of Commons public safety committee began discussing the revised definition of assault-style guns Tuesday, asking federal policy officials to explain the wording and its scope.Ĭonservative MP Doug Shipley said the planned definition was vague. The Liberals have been working behind the scenes in recent days to secure support for the new proposal from the NDP and Bloc Québécois. ![]() ![]() This new system is going to take that patchwork system and probably make it worse. “Critics have long said we have a bit of a patchwork of a system. “If you’re saying, well, we’re only going to treat new weapons that come into the market as prohibited, that’s not treating them all the same,” he said in an interview. Mary’s University in Halifax, says that means many currently available firearms won’t be prohibited even though they could meet the definition of an assault-style gun applied down the road.īrown said the approach clashes with the Nova Scotia mass shooting inquiry’s recent recommendation to ban all guns, not just some, that meet such criteria. The definition would include a firearm that is not a handgun that discharges centrefire ammunition in a semi-automatic manner, and that was originally designed with a detachable magazine with a capacity of six cartridges or more.īut the ban would not apply retroactively.īlake Brown, a historian at St. The government is proposing a ban on assault-style firearms that would apply once legislation now before Parliament comes into force. OTTAWA - A professor who has closely tracked the history of gun control says the Liberal government’s latest moves could make Canada’s complex firearm classification system even more complicated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |